La vie et l’après-vie d’un chien : Diogène le cynique et sa tradition (M. Sirois)

C’est avec grand plaisir que le Département des Études anciennes et Sciences des religions vous invite à participer à :

 

Une conférence intitulée

La vie et l’après-vie d’un chien : Diogène le cynique et sa tradition

 

Conférencier

Martin Sirois

Université McGill

Diogène de Sinope est une figure évasive et difficile à cerner dans l’histoire de la philosophie.  La biographie et la doxographie de ce personnage haut en couleur sont obscurcies par leur quasi absence de témoignages contemporains, mais Diogène demeure un philosophe incoutournable bien qu’inusité.  La conférence mettra en relief quelques “faits” et abordera la question de la tradition (évidemment, et nécessairement, littéraire) de Diogène.  Entre Histoire et fiction, que peut-on réellement savoir de la vie et la pensée de Diogène?  Et comment peut-on caractériser la tradition par laquelle il nous est connu?

 

Heure

14h30

19 septembre 2014

 

 

Lieu

Salle SMD 123

Pavillon Simard

Université d’Ottawa

60 University, Ottawa

 

 

Une colation légère sera servie

 

 

Pour plus de renseignements:

Geoffrey Greatrex : 613-562-5800 x. 5808 ou greatrex@uOttawa.ca

Sandra Clark : 613-562-5800 x.1163 ou smclark@uottawa.ca

Justification of Deduction and Induction (F. Huber)

Conférence | Talk

Franz Huber

(University of Toronto)

Justification of Deduction and Induction

This talk will cover some, but not all parts of a rather lengthy paper. The latter's thesis is that we can justify induction deductively, and that we can justify deduction inductively. I will begin by presenting my preferred variant of Hume (1739; 1748)'s argument for the thesis that we cannot justify the principle of induction. Then I will criticize the responses the resulting problem of induction has received by Carnap (1963; 1968) and by Goodman (1954), as well as briefly praise Reichenbach (1938; 1940)'s approach. 

Some of these authors compare induction to deduction. Haack (1976) compares deduction to induction, and I will critically discuss her argument for the thesis that we cannot justify the principles of deduction next. In concluding I will defend the thesis that we can justify induction by deduction, and deduction by induction, and that we can do so in a non-circular way. Along the way I will show how we can understand deduction and induction as normative theories, and I will argue that there are only hypothetical, but no categorical imperatives.

Friday, September 19th, 2014

3:00pm

University of Ottawa

Desmarais Hall (55, Laurier East)

Room 8161

Hegel Workshop

Atelier | Workshop

John Burbidge 

Hegel's Logic

John Burbidge (Trent University – Emeritus), noted Hegel scholar (The Logic of Hegel’s Logic) and external examiner for Wesley Furlotte’s upcoming PhD thesis defence, has agreed to lead an informal discussion on Hegel’s Logic (his own experience with its challenges, solutions etc.)

Source : Wikipedia

Friday, September 19th, 2014
3:00pm

University of Ottawa

Desmarais Building

Room 9143

In Defense of an Axiological Identification (D. Matheson)

Conférence | Talk

David Matheson

(Carleton University)

In Defense of an Axiological Identification

Friday, September 12th, 2014

3:00pm

Carleton University

River Building

Room 3228

Voir l'affiche | See poster

East-West Workshop : Minding the Brain

Congrès Jacques Ellul | Jacques Ellul Conference

The Philosophy of James of Viterbo

The Philosophy of James of Viterbo

An International Workshop
University of Ottawa
Ottawa, Canada
May 20-22, 2014

Source : Wikipedia

James of Viterbo was a master of theology at the University of Paris in the last decade of the thirteenth century. He was a contemporary of Godfrey of Fontaines, Giles of Rome, and Henry of Ghent, and was, like them, a major player in the philosophical and theological debates of his day. The Ottawa workshop will be the first international workshop entirely devoted to the thought of James of Viterbo. It will bring together some of the leading specialists in James scholarship and will cover all the major areas of his philosophical oeuvre, namely his philosophical theology, metaphysics, philosophy of nature, ethics, legal and political philosophy.