(Université de Liège)
Intentional Objects and their properties : a critical appraisal of Meinongian Logics
Source : Wikipedia
Friday, January 17th, 2014
According
to Alexius Meinong, statements such as "The round square is round (and
square)", "The golden mountain
is made of gold", "Pegasus has big wings" or "Unicorns have a horn on
their forehead" should be seen as talking about some genuine (yet
inexistent or even impossible) objects, and should be considered as true
or false whether these objects possess the properties
that are here attributed to them or not. On the contrary, Frege and
Russell's logical analyis tends to make these "objects" appear as
concepts (or propositional functions) that can be meaningful eventhough
they are not satisfied by any object at all. After
a brief presentation of Meinongian logics as well as of their benefits
and drawbacks compared to classical logic as well as to standard modal
logics, we will show that Meinongian logics not only require a clear-cut
distinction between two kinds of properties
(nuclear and extranuclear) but also between two kinds of predications
(encoding and exemplification) and, eventually, between two kinds of
objects (those which encode and those which exemplify their properties),
which somehow restores Frege's clear-cut distinction
between concepts and objects as well as between first order and second
order properties.
Friday, January 17th, 2014
3:00pm
University of Ottawa
Desmarais Hall (55, Laurier East)
Room 8161
Aucun commentaire:
Publier un commentaire